So, if you would be able to use low ISO most of the time, and 12MP is enough, the M2Zoom is also an option for photography. Regarding the spec differences: keep in mind that, depending on your style, many if not most subjects don't exceed even the M2Zoom's dynamic range.
Lrtimelapse free vs pro pro#
Coming from ground-based DSLR photography, the 3:2 is more my thing, and I often would crop the 4:3 photos from the M2Zoom (and M1Pro before that) to 3:2, further reducing resolution. There are essentially three different versions of LRTimelapse the free evaluation version, private license, and pro license. (Used the M2Zoom in the meantime, and that's my use case indeed: I want to have a backup, and the M2Zoom is a much better backup because it can share all accessories (except filters) with the M2Pro, while the M1Pro couldn't, so I sold that and bought the M2Zoom in addition to the M2Pro.)Īlso a major difference: the M2Zoom makes 4:3 photos, the M2Pro makes 3:2 photos. LRTimelapse does offer a very well-featured trial version for free. This allows you to apply adjustments and filters to multiple or all photographs in the time-lapse it will also transition between these adjustments to allow a smooth appearance. My M2Pro had a decentered lens first, so I sent it back to DJI for exchange, and got a good one back. LRTimelapse allows you to use RAW images and coordinates with Adobe Lightroom. The lens of the M2Zoom has a weak spot, which is corner sharpness at 24 mm, but it's tolerable for most subjects I think. Same goes for the telephoto end: You may be unable to descend into a crater or something because you would lose radio connectivity, so you can stay higher and zoom in with the M2Zoom, and end up with more pixels than using the M2Pro and cropping afterwards.
Lrtimelapse free vs pro software#
You can easily see that premiere and flicker free alone were not ver. Adobe Premiere Pro Professional software Final Cut Pro Mac software for time-lapse videos iMovie User-friendly LRTimelapse Sophisticated tool for.
So, if you're restricted in altitude, those 4 mm more might be what you need to get the picture you want because the 28 mm of the M2Pro aren't wide enough. A comparison of deflickering softwares like premiere pro, LRTimeLapse, and Flicker Free. I also tried the M2Zoom for photography, and it has a few more subtle advantages as well. More dynamic range, more resolution, less noise. Thanks to the awesome guys and gals at Newegg, we recently had the opportunity to co-build a high-end custom dual-Intel Xeon workstation for image and video post-production work. The M2Pro is generally better, of course. I have both M2Pro and M2Zoom, and had a M1Pro before, and I'm mostly into photography rather than videography.
0 kommentar(er)
